You can read the article 8/21/2022 (el pais) about the cover-up by Spanish prelates of innumerable crimes, highlighting the "divinity" with which they have been treated for their status as "ecclesiastics" for years. Reviewing our article 14 of the constitution: "Spaniards are equal before the law and no discrimination can prevail due to .... or any other personal or social condition or circumstance." But in the face of this attempt at constitutional order, when do our judges look at their navel? and therefore the rest that has been granted gauging privileges so that it would not be so noticeable.
It is undoubtedly perverse "the divinity" that some institutions of "discriminatory treatment before the law" apply to themselves, violating article 14 of the constitution. The one received by our magistrates is the most relevant because it should not be forgotten that they apply the law in an inbred way. You can see in the fragments that we publish on our website the innumerable crimes of prevarication committed by the different jurisdictions of our country and that have gone unpunished before the judges of judges (TSJM) who have spared no tricks to cover up, obstruct the crimes of their companions . We report here some of them that are undoubtedly striking and that, although they have not prescribed, remain unrecognized by any judicial institution to date. (all of them accredited if you are interested in any of them contact us)
- Magistrate of first instance concocts, arrogates and instructs a €500.000 lawsuit with intimidating fines against a citizen who denounces a network of misappropriation in urban entities of a Madrid municipality.
- Magistrate of first instance admits to process a complaint of €500.000 in which a document protected by the LOPD is used, that is to say, it is proven that the document has been stolen from a town hall but it is omitted.
- Magistrate of first instance concocts, arrogates and instructs a €50.000 lawsuit for crimes of slander against a property manager despite the fact that it is proven that he has obtained €120,000 in profits and paid €30,000 in company taxes in an absurd way, since the entity is nonprofit
- Magistrate of first instance prevents a member of the community from providing documents (minutes of meetings of a community) in a preliminary diligence procedure.
- Magistrate of first instance overruling procedure omitting proof of false contract in the face of a complaint of unfair administration
- Magistrate of first instance oversee procedure omitting proof of postal certificate that proves the absence of summons in form and term
- Magistrate of first instance prevents appeal by providing a false cd of the hearing
- Magistrates of the Provincial Court inadmissible appeal of complaint of not having provided cd of the hearing in form and term
- Magistrates of the Provincial Court inadmissible annulment appeal that the same section judges and inadmits two procedures (main and precautionary)
- TSJM's magistrates provide false tax report to not admit prevarication complaint
- TSJM's magistrates inadmissible prevarication complaint arguing "that there is no right to success" and omitting to refer to "some" of 12 crimes.
- Magistrates of the TSJM do not admit and ignore the complaint filed on article 35.1 of the LOTC: which obliges any magistrate to denounce any law that violates the constitution, understand all the laws of the priviledges
- AN magistrates condemn for absence of if another "si y otro si digo" a denouncer of illegal aid to companies. Accredited with a sentence of the EEC
- Magistrates of the TC and the ECHR have not considered any of these crimes that have been escalated to their jurisdictions "estimable-admissible" either.