Monarchy and dictatorship are extreme hierarchical systems that represent clear examples of excessive concentration of power in a single person or a small elite group: North Korea, Afghanistan, Cuba... are current examples. There are other so-called "democratic" countries where hierarchical structures continue to exist that, in practice, undermine the principles of plurality, transparency and control that should define a true democracy. It is grotesque and deeply disheartening to observe how these "de facto hierarchical" systems perpetuate vices: concentration of power, corruption and lack of accountability. Current examples are: Venezuela and Russia, ... and Spain also?
We live in changing times, where the truth, no matter how hard they try to hide it, ends up coming to light. When the powers that be violate the rules of the rule of law to silence those who denounce corruption, it is a historical pattern that anticipates a turning point. The desperation of the corrupt reaches its climax, we have been marked by impunity for 40 years, many citizens are alert and aware of the atrocities committed from the spheres of power. What is it that really worries these characters? Are they afraid of ending up in prison? Are they obsessed with securing their fortunes? Or perhaps they fantasize about escaping to destinations such as the United Arab Emirates?
The "pro-homine interpretation" is an essential legal principle in the field of human rights, the purpose of which is to guarantee the maximum protection and effectiveness of fundamental rights. This principle, widely recognized internationally, is also enshrined in our Constitution, specifically in article 10.2. .. I wonder: how is it possible that we find ourselves before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) demanding fundamental rights, such as equality, when our internal regulations are full of provisions that reflect rigor and commitment to their protection?
They say that our 6 historical constitutions were "programmatic", that is, they were considered declarations of "ideals or intentions" but they did not obligate public powers to comply with their provisions. It is of interest to "weigh" because our current Constitution (1978) is not considered "programmatic" but rather "normative". "Supposedly" because the public powers are subject to its regulations with "binding" force or in the sense that the constitutional precepts They are directly applicable.... Do you believe it?
It is worrying to observe how, in our journalistic media, it is reported that "justice" in other countries legitimizes injustices and violations of fundamental rights, simply because it is "No justice." We must not forget that the human condition, shared by all the inhabitants of this planet, groups us into what we could call "interest groups." Throughout history, we have witnessed how "the power" deceives "the people", using tricks and taking advantage of the submission and ease with which many people are manipulated. What is surprising, without a doubt, is that "the fear" of dissent by those in power is so "palpable." The question arises: what can happen to you when you disagree?
The economic development of a country undoubtedly depends on how well its Judicial body works. In a very simple way we can say that justice is in charge of "the rules" being followed.Where are the rules of the game defined? if you doubt the Spanish constitution or also called Magna Carta. The transparency of this body and the rigor when it comes to regulating compliance with its doctrines determine its operation
The concept of privileged is based on the fact that a person, by exercising a public office or by his profession, enjoys a series of procedural rights, among which is that, if he is investigated for a crime, he must be tried by a court other than the one that will correspond to an ordinary citizen Our association ACCYDED has filed a claim with the ombudsman on 10-13-2021
We are coordinated with other organizations that have been fighting for the same ideals as us for several years. The results are uncertain, not to say non-existent, and hence the great doubts arise: Why doesn't corruption end? Is there no public institution that pursues it? Answer: ..... NO INTEREST, Be clear about the old Spanish saying "a troubled river profit of fishermen"
We live in a corrupt country in which the institutions do not put any stop to this diminishing. Our politicians spend the day throwing the junk between them and only worry that the valuations of their allies do not fall, that is, there is no intention to change the panorama. The rule of law we can affirm categorically does not exist in our country, if you have any doubts consult any of the organizations related to ours. We have to pursue Spain v2.0
These public law entities for the management of urbanizations that are usually found on the outskirts of the urban nucleus. With the proliferation of this type of residential, there is confusion when considering the subject of the Community of Owners and the EUCC, because they are different things.A relevant aspect is that what must be conserved belongs to the City Council, that is, the purpose of the Conservation Entity is to COLLABORATE with the corresponding Public Administration
It is mandatory for all municipalities and autonomous communities to promote sport. This expense represents a significant outlay in institutional budgets. the economic management of these sports clubs and associations is not always overly controlled. In theory, if the club is federated, it should present its financial statements once a year. Does it happen?
In general, it is a game in which it is deceived and usually even made with accomplices who help in one way or another to its success, it is undoubtedly the most widespread practice in our days to deceive citizens. Let's look at some examples in which it is enough that in a meeting we have a few like-minded who agree with us at the right moment and who shout when we want to take the voice away from the victim of deception
In 2021 the EU will issue a significant joint debt issue to finance the recovery fund, in parallel it has launched the first European prosecutor's office in charge of prosecuting crimes against the financial interests of the club. It is true that finding where to file a claim is not an easy task but we provide you with the link. There is a similar figure called Olaf in which fraud can be reported, this new body intends to complement it since it requires that the scam exceed € 10 million .
It is difficult to understand that 10 years have passed with cumbersome judicial processes, simple facts such as "1+1=2" have not been recognized. Numerous violations of the "rule of law" have occurred. We are facing a criminal network with many institutions involved, including the most sensitive (the judicial), with serious difficulties in recognizing the crimes of prevarication produced among its members, discerning between the legal and the corporate is a difficult task despite being guarantees of the law.
The European Court of Human Rights is for European citizens the last chance for justice. Getting justice in this fourth instance puts national justice in a compromised situation. This court has included in its statutes and rules the defense of an impartial and fair court. In our experience we have already had three attempts, paradoxically all three have fallen into the same section and a single judge has been assigned, it gives the impression that the last judicial instance clearly suffers from the impartiality that it promulgates because in all three cases it has been our turn the same judge ;-)
Alexéi Navalni is a critical person against the government of his country (Russia), he is a lawyer and defender of the laws that must be followed in a democratic country. You can see his story on a TV platform, what is relevant about his unfortunate situation (recently died) is to be able to demonstrate how corrupt governments strive to control power, ultimately public money, regardless of life, freedom or rights. of a citizen. Don't be naive thinking that only the outsiders are "bad". In the Kingdom of Spain we have a client and captive press that will avoid publishing the dirty laundry of our oligarchs.