The social instability that occurs when a referee is not fair and favors a team with his decisions is striking. In justice there is no VAR, is there? Can it be understood that a judge who judges another judge exonerates him arguing that "there is no right to be right"? . Serious is triggered when acts occur that violate the rights of a party. Can you imagine a referee tripping the players? . Without making value judgments about the impunity in which our courts move before this type of irregularities, it contrasts with the message that is disseminated in the media regarding its slowness
How would the following acts be defined in court?
- Override/disallow a procedure based on a prosecutor report that is not provided together with the magistrate's decision
- Hide a prosecutor report when what is interesting is not said
- provide a prosecutor report without an entry stamp or anonymous and base the decision on it despite being a false document
- provide an empty hearing cd for while the court is requested to correct its error argue that the time to appeal has expired
- bypassing the distribution rules of a court assigning all the procedures to a single court
- When the distribution of a procedure does not interest, you can always assign a new court by hand or reject it so that it touches the one that interests
The rules that define "equality of arms" in a judicial process do not exist in our country, we can prove it.
Therefore , the decisions of our magistrates are not being assessed if they are arbitrary or not . So we have judges who trip up with impunity, we already know our judges can even lie.